tinkerbell: So what are we into now? Motes in eyes?

Must be a genetic predisposition.

quote:

Originally posted by philnic:
Presumably he expects the owner of the additional legs to ignore them because they are immoral, and proceed through life pretending they only have two legs. Never mind the psychological harm this will do.

It's decided for them before they're old enough to have a say.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/HEALTH/11/07/india.girl/

Watch for this girl to bring a lawsuit for wrongful amputation!

tinkerbell, well that seems the gist of the whole discussion. Is predisposition your excuse?

Tho with great personal difficulty, Christ was in the position to offer others a way around or thru their own personal pre-dispositions. And usually with similar personal pain and tribulations. Ultimately, he showed that there was a way thru the end-all pre-disposition, personal death.

Nard! Could we have that in plain English please?

quote:

Originally posted by libRArY:
tinkerbell, well that seems the gist of the whole discussion. Is predisposition your excuse?

Well, it was until I read Nard's post! I'm double-locking the doors tonight.

Maybe the problem is that it IS in plain English!

Or plain American. Not my first language I'm afraid.

Are you a fundamentalist?

quote:

Originally posted by philnic:
Never mind the psychological harm this will do.

Phil makes a very good point.

quote:

Originally posted by Braling II:
Anyone remember Francesco Lentini?

It's the third leg that makes the difference!

Now if they could only fiddle with chicken and turkey genes with an end toward satisfying those of us who have a predisposition for enjoying drumsticks!

(I'm a giblet man myself!)

BII, better still: cross a chicken with an octopus. That way, everybody gets a leg.

(Unless it's a Ray Harryhausen octopus, in which case one person goes without.)

quote:

Originally posted by Braling II:
Anyone remember Francesco Lentini?

Which of the three legs did he deny having?

Rolf Harris might know.