Do you think the movie was more interesting than the Book?
[This message has been edited by ThaoBoy (edited 11-18-2004).]
what are you talking about!!!!!!!
Yeah it was tons funnier.
thao you know the movie we're watching right now is actually creepy... especially when that old lady was being bruned.... :P
Um...i don't know....,but i think the movie was better...i think...yeah...i think...hehehe!
i think that i rather watch the movie. because i can see whats happening..
the movie was better....
the movie was very dissapointing to me, considering the talent involved. and it went way to far from the original story. faber and the hound weren't even in it.
"The drain of talent - pure talent - from one single department, Feature Animation, has been absolutely gut-wrenching in the past year. People are being asked to leave because management - meaning Michael Eisner - can't figure out what to do with them. That is not the fault of the talent... it's the fault of management." <br />�Roy E. Disney <br /><br />savedisney.com<br />for future generations
i hate you, movies are never better than the books. unless your one of those people with zero imagination who have to be fed images by a tube.
I agree with mycroft.. if you like the movie better, you must have no imagination. The book was awesome! I love the way Bradbury writes.
Yes, how could any movie be better than Ray Bradbury's writing?
|Powered by Social Strata|