Oh PLEASE 'rise' to the bait, somebody ...

quote:

Originally posted by Phil Knox:
Is anyone surprised Bradbury would go for the prevalent mood of much in the theater nowadays, presenting some sort of nudity?

No - it's in the story, it's not gratuitous, and RB has never been prudish about such things.

[/QUOTE]
No - it's in the story, it's not gratuitous, and RB has never been prudish about such things.[/QUOTE]

_________________________
Gee, Mr. Spaulding. By your definition Jesus was the biggest prude of all time.

And yes, I know the story of Invisible Boy.

quote:

Originally posted by Phil Knox:
Gee, Mr. Spaulding. By your definition Jesus was the biggest prude of all time.

I don't know about that, but I'll tell you what (seriously); I just got an email from Mr B inviting us over on Monday, so if you like I could ask him about the nudity, but I believe he'll say the same thing I just did.

There you go Mr. Spaulding. Ask Mr. Bradbury about that! And while you are there ask a little further as well. Does he have any moral wall when it has to do with boys and nudity.

quote:

Originally posted by Phil Knox:
Does he have any moral wall when it has to do with boys and nudity.

Well I believe this question teeters on the edge of good taste, and my part in this conversation ends here.

My best to you sir.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Doug Spaulding, 31 January 2008 09:32 PM

Teeters is a good word.

"Teeters" is better than "flirts".

quote:

Originally posted by Braling II:
"Teeters" is better than "flirts".

After consideration, I thought so, too.